The topic of the 11th KPI Congress was ‘Conflict, Legitimacy and Government Reform: Equitable Allocation of Resources in Thai Society’ 5th to the 7th November 2009 at the United Nations Conference Center. Each year, the KPI Congress is the occasion for members of the House of Representatives, members of the Senate, academics and members of the civil society to discuss political challenges ahead and brainstorm about potential solutions as well as to present the latest academic research about Thai politics.
The KPI system of award and certificates has been created in order to showcase best practices in the field of good governance. It has been conferred yearly since 2001. In 2009, the KPI award was granted to 24 local administrations while 10 others received the KPI certificate. They were competing in three different categories:
- transparency and public participation - promotion of peace and conciliation - networking with private and civil society sectors
Delegates from the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria
November 18, 2009
Delegates from the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria visit King Prajadhipok’s Institute
Deputy Secretary General Assoc. Prof. Woothisarn Tanchai and Academic Expert on International Relations Dr. Pimon Ruetrakul welcomed eight delegates from the Federal Republic of Nigeria on their study visit to King Prajadhipok’s Institute on November 18, 2009. The group consisted of members of parliament, senators and state officials from the Committee on Establishments and Public Service, the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The delegates received a briefing and exchanged views on the work and training courses offered by KPI, particularly on issues related to parliamentary academic support work.
Lese-Majeste: A Distinctive Character of Thai Democracy amidst the Global Democratic Movement
by: Professor Dr. Borwornsak Uwanno Fellow of the Royal Institute Secretary-General of King Prajadhipok's Institute
Recently, certain Thai academics have put forward a proposal that lese-majeste offence contravenes the democratic principle of freedom of expression, and, second, lese-majeste allegations have been abused by accusers for political gain.
This article aims to make an academic analysis to determine whether this particular offence should be maintained. If the answer is yes, then what is the conceptual basis? If no, then why is it so? are there any problem with enforcement of the law? If so, how can these problems be resolved?
One major political theme evident in May was apparent tension between the Democrats and coalition partner Bhumjaithai Party. Though leading figures in both parties repeatedly denied any conflicts, commentators wondered whether the governing coalition was in jeopardy.
Thai Politics Monitor March 2009
March 2009
For the government coalition, the month began with attempts to win broad popular support, and deal with the encroaching economic crisis. Attention soon turned, however, to fending off parliamentary censure launched by the opposition, and dealing with a challenge from Thaksin Shinawatra and the red-shirted United Front of Democracy Against Dictatorship.
Thai Politics Monitor April 2009
The overshadowing political event of April was the ongoing United Front of Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD) demonstration that eventually escalated into the Songkran riots.
Thai Politics Monitor June 2009
In party politics, tensions continued between the Democrats and their coalition partners. Though certain circumstances and developments seemed to encourage the parties to back off from their points of conflict.
Thai Politics Monitor July 2009
The parliamentary committee on national reconciliation, political reform and constitution amendment, chaired by Senator Direk Thungfang, prepared a report identifying six areas of the 2007 constitution that cause social division and conflict, and thus should be amended: dissolution of political parties and banning of executives from politics; the procedure for becoming an MP (apparently largely focusing on whether House constituencies should remain multi-member or return to being single-member districts); the procedure for becoming a senator; parliamentary endorsement of international treaties; appointment of MPs to other political positions (currently forbidden); and parliamentarians’ authority to help solve people’s problems (apparently meaning their scope to influence the activities of state agencies and possibly access to constituency development funding).